plus 2, How Washington Could Create Jobs - Yahoo Finance |
- How Washington Could Create Jobs - Yahoo Finance
- Great interview but No Offer: Why You Didn’t Get the Job - US News and World Report
- Oakland County Job Expo - msnbc.com
| How Washington Could Create Jobs - Yahoo Finance Posted: 29 Oct 2010 07:03 AM PDT Congress has the means to spur job growth, economists say, if it can find the will The federal government has spent hundreds of billions of dollars to lift Americans out of the worst economic downturn since the 1930s, but jobs remain in short supply. About 14.8 million people are unemployed — an increase of more than 7 million since the recession began. And as slow as Congress has been to act while Democrats controlled both chambers, an increasingly divided political landscape after the election is expected to create an even worse logjam in Washington. Still, there could be room for more jobs programs if lawmakers allow cuts to be made elsewhere, observers said. And if Washington can find the will, economists say there are ways the government could spur job growth, and help the nation recover from a recession that technically ended last year but is still damaging families across the country. Spending on infrastructure is one way to help create jobs, and it might enjoy political support, said Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody's Analytics, an economic and financial research firm. Infrastructure projects build jobs Analysts have found that spending on infrastructure has a relatively high payoff in terms of boosting the overall economy. Another major point in favor of additional infrastructure spending: It would help some of the workers who have been most hurt in the recession, such as construction workers. "That would be a good way to go that has political tailwinds to it," Zandi said. "There will be more political gridlock in the wake of the election, but I sense that there is room for potential compromise on this." It might even be possible to increase infrastructure spending at little cost to taxpayers, Zandi said. For example, private capital could be used to build roads, bridges and sewer systems, and the government could allow companies to charge user fees and tolls. "A lot of pension funds, insurance companies, have liabilities that are very long term," Zandi said. "This kind of income stream is stable, so it would be a perfect investment for that kind of capital." However, political leaders have been too slow to implement infrastructure projects, said Gary Burtless, an economist at the Brookings Institution, a Washington think tank. "It's not as though it's hard to find construction workers, or the inputs needed. What's in short supply is the imagination and resourcefulness of public leaders in getting the money spent fast," Burtless said. "We want to get people on payrolls quickly. For some reason we seem to have forgotten how to go about building public infrastructure projects in the near term." Austan Goolsbee, chairman of the president's Council of Economic Advisers, recently told MarketWatch that policies that encourage investment in the U.S. are the best way to generate sustainable job creation. "Some of those the president has been putting in place, like the small-business bill," Goolsbee said. "Some are on his agenda — he has called for allowing expensing of investment, encouraging infrastructure spending, encouraging R&D spending by private companies. "We need to return to a boom that is of a different style than it was in the 2000s. The 2000s boom was driven by consumption growth that was not sustainable," Goolsbee said. The president "wants us to go to more of a business-investment-led boom, an export-driven boom, with consumption growth proportional to income, but in a sustainable way where people have a personal savings rate more like 5%, not zero or negative." In September, House Republican Leader John Boehner, of Ohio, said the president's proposals "fall well short" of addressing the main obstacles to job creation. "I think the president is missing the bigger point here ... With all of the spending in Washington, and all the uncertainty facing small businesses — including the coming tax hikes on January 1st — until this uncertainty and spending is under control, I don't think these are going to have much impact." Support state and local governments Another effective strategy would be to increase aid to state and local governments, economists said. Expanding that assistance could be achieved relatively quickly, and would have an immediate positive impact, said Lawrence Katz, an economist at Harvard University. Still, there could be room for more jobs programs if lawmakers allow cuts to be made elsewhere, observers said. And if Washington can find the will, economists say there are ways the government could spur job growth, and help the nation recover from a recession that technically ended last year but is still damaging families across the country. Spending on infrastructure is one way to help create jobs, and it might enjoy political support, said Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody's Analytics, an economic and financial research firm. Infrastructure projects build jobs Analysts have found that spending on infrastructure has a relatively high payoff in terms of boosting the overall economy. Another major point in favor of additional infrastructure spending: It would help some of the workers who have been most hurt in the recession, such as construction workers. "That would be a good way to go that has political tailwinds to it," Zandi said. "There will be more political gridlock in the wake of the election, but I sense that there is room for potential compromise on this." It might even be possible to increase infrastructure spending at little cost to taxpayers, Zandi said. For example, private capital could be used to build roads, bridges and sewer systems, and the government could allow companies to charge user fees and tolls. "A lot of pension funds, insurance companies, have liabilities that are very long term," Zandi said. "This kind of income stream is stable, so it would be a perfect investment for that kind of capital." However, political leaders have been too slow to implement infrastructure projects, said Gary Burtless, an economist at the Brookings Institution, a Washington think tank. "It's not as though it's hard to find construction workers, or the inputs needed. What's in short supply is the imagination and resourcefulness of public leaders in getting the money spent fast," Burtless said. "We want to get people on payrolls quickly. For some reason we seem to have forgotten how to go about building public infrastructure projects in the near term." Austan Goolsbee, chairman of the president's Council of Economic Advisers, recently told MarketWatch that policies that encourage investment in the U.S. are the best way to generate sustainable job creation. "Some of those the president has been putting in place, like the small-business bill," Goolsbee said. "Some are on his agenda — he has called for allowing expensing of investment, encouraging infrastructure spending, encouraging R&D spending by private companies. "We need to return to a boom that is of a different style than it was in the 2000s. The 2000s boom was driven by consumption growth that was not sustainable," Goolsbee said. The president "wants us to go to more of a business-investment-led boom, an export-driven boom, with consumption growth proportional to income, but in a sustainable way where people have a personal savings rate more like 5%, not zero or negative." In September, House Republican Leader John Boehner, of Ohio, said the president's proposals "fall well short" of addressing the main obstacles to job creation. "I think the president is missing the bigger point here ... With all of the spending in Washington, and all the uncertainty facing small businesses — including the coming tax hikes on January 1st — until this uncertainty and spending is under control, I don't think these are going to have much impact." Support state and local governments Another effective strategy would be to increase aid to state and local governments, economists said. Expanding that assistance could be achieved relatively quickly, and would have an immediate positive impact, said Lawrence Katz, an economist at Harvard University. "Right now states are a fiscal drag. [Assistance] would prevent layoffs, and get money out there, and do a lot of good, whether it's for education or keeping police," Katz said. While Washington has already sent some aid to state and local governments, some economists say more is needed. The weak housing market and high unemployment have hit states hard, and some states are cutting a slew of public programs and services to balance their budgets. "The worst recession since the 1930s has caused the steepest decline in state tax receipts on record," according to recent analysis from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. "As a result, even after making very deep spending cuts over the last two years, states continue to face large budget gaps. States will continue to struggle to find the revenue needed to support critical public services for a number of years, threatening hundreds of thousands of jobs." When a teacher or policeman loses a job, the community loses his services, but it also means that worker stops buying goods and services, helping to perpetuate a dangerous economic spiral, economists said. "As states cut programs, they are taking money out of the economy, and that not only leads to layoffs in the public sector, but also the private sector," said Lawrence Mishel, president of the Economic Policy Institute, a think tank in Washington. "Providing money to the states for health and education jobs also benefits private-sector jobs. When you keep everyone employed they are out buying from the private sector." Mishel said that partisan politics are likely to stand in the way of Congress sending more money to state and local governments. Still, he said, despite the country's $1.3 trillion deficit — almost 9% of gross domestic product — spending more now to create jobs is a good idea. "There's a vast misunderstanding about the deficit," Mishel said. "The reason we have a large fiscal deficit is because we had a huge recession, not because spending is out of control. We will never get the fiscal deficit under control unless we create many, many more jobs. Generating more jobs is actually a complement to getting the deficit under control." Still, with a national unemployment rate of 9.6%, reviving the labor market won't be inexpensive, said Timothy Bartik, senior economist at the W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research in Kalamazoo, Mich. "Even if job creation can be made relatively cheaper, it will still cost a lot of money to make a big dent," Bartik said. Tax incentives for businesses Economists also support various tax incentives for private investment and hiring. First and foremost, to help job growth Washington needs to nail down the tax code, Zandi said. "Uncertainty has been an impediment to businesses using their profits and cash for investing and hiring," Zandi said. "It's disconcerting for business people, and that's a problem. They don't know how to plan. If they can't cross the Ts and dot the Is, they are unlikely to make a big hiring decision. Business people need everything colored in before they make a big decision." Burtless favors tax incentives to persuade companies to move forward soon with investments and hiring. Cutting payroll taxes would be helpful, though expensive, said economist David Autor of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "It makes it cheaper for employers to employ people," Autor said. "It would be an effective way to stimulate demand." Help hard-hit groups Economists also favor policies, such as youth employment programs, that target specific groups facing a particularly tough labor market. The unemployment rate is about 23% for white teens, and a whopping 49% for African American teens. "There is great harm being done right now to young people out in the labor market and not able to find jobs, and not able to get on the lower rungs of career ladders," Mishel said. The downturn has been particularly tough on groups with unemployment rates that were already high before the recession, Goolsbee said. "Many of the groups that have the highest unemployment rates are also the most cyclical they're the hardest hit when the economy turns down, and if you can turn the economy up they tend to be the groups that are the next in line to come back," he said. One way to create more opportunity for young workers, Mishel said: Let older workers collect Social Security at a younger age. "If they retired that would open up jobs for younger people," he said. "We would be moving people out of jobs. We don't even need to create new jobs. Getting older people out so that young people could have jobs is very intuitive." However, Dean Baker, co-director for the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, said older workers may not have enough retirement savings to leave the workforce early. Baker said work-sharing programs, in which the government encourages firms to reduce hours, rather than layoff workers, are effective. "You are keeping someone in touch with the labor force," Baker said. The president likes the idea of work-sharing policies, Goolsbee said. "Look at Germany, they have engaged in a significant amount of work sharing, and the unemployment rate has remained relatively low, and the slack was absorbed by reduced hours rather than reduced workers. I think [work sharing] is definitely worth considering, and the president has been supportive of that," Goolsbee said. MIT's Autor said a more highly valued yuan would help the U.S. job market. The increase of the trade deficit with China could displace more than 500,000 U.S. jobs this year, according to a recent analysis by the Economic Policy Institute. "There's no easy answer," Autor said. But a revalued Chinese currency "would have a substantial effect on U.S. employment." Ruth Mantell is a MarketWatch reporter based in Washington. ___ Popular Stories on Yahoo!: • 4 Reasons Gold ETFs Are Still A Popular Bet • When Selling Puts, Have an Exit Plan • Early Voting May Depress Voter Turnout ___ This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now |
| Great interview but No Offer: Why You Didn’t Get the Job - US News and World Report Posted: 29 Oct 2010 05:58 AM PDT You've had several interviews and haven't landed the perfect job yet. The interviews seem to go well from your perspective, but then, surprisingly, you find yourself without an offer. Here are five reasons that might explain why you didn't get the job: 1. You sounded desperate. Hiring manager and recruiters can tell when someone is genuinely interested in their position or in any position. Knowing as much as you can about the opportunity and asking smart questions during the interview will show the hiring manager you've taken the time to evaluate the opportunity. Companies want to hire people who are passionate about what they do and who want to work with them. You need to be able to articulate what it is about this opportunity and this company that interests you. If you don't, you might seem willing to take anything you are offered—and that's a big turnoff! [See 21 Secrets to Getting the Job.] 2. You didn't sell yourself. Part of your responsibility in the interview is to tell your story. The stories you share will depend on the types of questions you're asked, but it doesn't hurt to anticipate some of those questions and prepare a few stories beforehand. Be specific and detailed in your answers and back up your experience with anecdotes that illustrates how you qualify for the job. Consider using the STAR model: talk about situation, task, action, and results. Even if you don't have a chance to tell these specific stories, the exercise of preparing to tell them, of thinking them through, will make you a more prepared candidate. [See Why You Didn't Get Hired.] 3. You oversold yourself. There's a fine line between confidence and arrogance—and crossing it is a deal breaker. Stay away from "what's in it for me?" types of questions. Know what you don't know and readily admit your mistakes if asked about them. Flexibility, adaptability, and willingness to learn are all qualities you want to exude as a confident job seeker. 4. An employee referral or internal candidate popped up. If two candidates have a similar background and one comes with an internal referral, the company is more likely to take the safer path. The employer already has an idea of how an internal candidate will perform in a role based on their experience working together. A referred candidate, too, typically has a working relationship with someone in the company who can attest to his or her work ethic. Companies trust these referrals because they expect their employees to refer only candidates who would reflect well on them. [For more career advice, visit U.S. News Careers.] 5. The job specifications changed. This is a common occurrence, especially with newly created positions. As hiring authorities meet potential candidates and hear about their experiences, they sometimes recognize new priorities or goals that relate to the position, which may cause them to shift their hiring focus. Lindsay Olson is a founding partner and recruiter with Paradigm Staffing, a national search firm that specializes in placing public relations and communications professionals. She blogs at LindsayOlson.com, where she discusses recruiting and job search issues. This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now |
| Oakland County Job Expo - msnbc.com Posted: 29 Oct 2010 04:39 AM PDT PONTIAC, Mich. — JobFairGiant.com is hosting an event on Friday to connect job seekers with several companies looking to hire. The Empowering Michigan Career Expo will start at 9:00 a.m. and end at 3:00 p.m. at the Marriot Hotel located at 3600 Centerpointe Parkway in Pontiac. Several companies including 1-800-Hanson, Convergys, Hope Network, Minacs, Ameristaff Nursing, Metlife, Local Retailers and many others will be looking to hire on site. Job Seekers are encouraged to dress professionally at the October 29th Career Expo. Men should wear dress slacks, dress shirt and tie and avoid wearing gym shoes or blue jeans. Woman should wear dress slacks, single color blouse and mid-to-low heels. Job seekers are also expected to bring several copies of their current resume. The Empowering Michigan Career Expo event is free to the public and will offer attendees and opportunity to visit with business representatives about job openings and business opportunities. Businesses interested in registering for a booth should contact JobFairGiant.com at 734-956-4550. Additional expo information is available at . This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Add Images to any RSS Feed To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |

No comments:
Post a Comment